Skip to main content

WearDealsHub

Today’s Deals →

Both of these are max-cushion daily trainers with loyal followings, and they cost within twenty dollars of each other. Here is how they actually differ on the road.

Best Value

Hoka Clifton 9

Editor’s Pick

New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v13

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Clifton 9 is lighter on the foot
  • 1080v13 has the roomier toe box
  • Both available in wide fittings

Cons

  • Neither is built for fast tempo work

Pick the Clifton 9 if you want the lighter, more nimble of the two. Pick the 1080v13 if you want the softer heel and more room up front — it is the better option for wider feet.

What to Look For in a Daily Trainer

For most runners, a daily trainer should feel unremarkable — no hot spots, no dead cushioning, no fighting the shoe on turns. Pay attention to heel-to-toe drop (8–10mm suits most people transitioning from older shoes, lower drops reward a more midfoot strike) and weight, since anything under 10oz starts to feel noticeably quicker on tempo days. Plan to replace a daily trainer every 300–500 miles; the upper often still looks fine long after the midsole cushioning has quietly flattened out.

Final Verdict

The Hoka Clifton 9 wins on value and weight; the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v13 wins on fit and plushness. Neither is a wrong answer u2014 it comes down to how much room your foot wants.

8.5
Our Score

Pros

Cons

Related Reviews